I was hoping you’d say this so I didn’t feel compelled to.Amsteel was never intended to be used for life safety. Show me an industrial harness or arb saddle that uses Amsteel for the life safety connection? Maybe there is one, but I haven't found it in all my discussions and research. This is marketing being pushed by saddle manufacturers, accessories too. Amsteel isn't new and has been around forever.
The durability of Amsteel can't match climbing rope. Amsteel is an awesome product, but there are better options for climbing.
The weight savings is nil when comparing a 6' piece to climbing rope.
Let’s ask @Fl Canopy StalkerDid Wood saddles go out of business because they knew this thread would come into existence one day or did they provide Amstel bridges on their saddles because they are superior to rope?
Thanks. No expert, but I've been fortunate to learn from and work with some top industry folks over the years.I was hoping you’d say this so I didn’t feel compelled to.
I guess I understand a fixed amsteel bridge for the friction coefficient over a carabiner but if you do any research at all into knots and splicing and bend radii and how amsteel behaves in these various situations…let’s just say I won’t be using an amsteel tether with amsteel prusik or an adjustable shwabisch-based amsteel bridge on my own setup, and I kinda say a Hail Mary for anyone who does use these kinda systems. Some of the slippage and break testing I’ve seen, even on spliced amsteel, is really pucker-inducing, considering some of the activities and climbing methods used by fellow “saddle hunters”. Amsteel prusiks sliding at hyper low kN ratings, amsteel splices done without precision tapering breaking well below MBS, and sliding knots causing so much heat that they cut clear through themselves basically. Not to mention that knots lower the MBS of amsteel by upwards of 70% in many cases.
We all know I’m not an expert, but @TreeRecon is. There are many cheap, ultra-strong, knottable and/or spliceable climbing ropes available that are barely a few ounces heavier per foot than amsteel, and are actually purpose-built for similar use to “saddle hunting”.
Let’s ask @Fl Canopy Stalker
I have always trusted his idea of “safety” so he probably knows something I/we don’t.
You actually have WAH experience and climb trees for a living, do you not?Thanks. No expert, but I've been fortunate to learn from and work with some top industry folks over the years.
Just found this gem from earlier in the year. Canopy addresses differences between using Amsteel on bridge vs LB/tether:I used to share the same opinion as you on amsteel bridges. It was actually @Fl Canopy Stalker that talked me out of my anti amsteel position on bridges, at least to the point I won’t cut off an amsteel bridge that comes on a saddle from the manufacturer. I also won’t choose it as my first choice.
Even more glad I bought a Cruzr nowYou are going yo see fewer Amsteel bridges. Tethrd has a patent and they are inforcing it.
I like my HTP rope bridge on my Transformer.
Google Patents
Search and read the full text of patents from around the world with Google Patents, and find prior art in our index of non-patent literature.patents.google.com
Splicing is the only proper method
Amsteel is designed for straight pulls. Think about the original intention, winches etc.
You're not supposed to tie knots in Amsteel and are supposed to splice instead.
I could be wrong, but I believe this has to do with the bend radius. I think 3:1 ratio of host diameter to diameter of eye (or greater) is acceptable with dyneema/amsteel but someone may correct me on that. I think this “rule”, if it is one, suggests that you shouldn’t put too sharp of a bend radius on a properly spliced eye, either. So, again, leaves the consumer (us) to either do their own homework (shocking) or DIY a solution without necessarily acquiescing to the product’s inherent strengths or weaknesses (equally shocking). Tons of gray area to play in there. I’m not a huge personal fan of gray areas in my equipment, and I value purpose-built equipment. but I also appreciate multi-purpose gear…more gray area.What I was getting at is that if you can’t bend amsteel, then you also can’t pull with a splice eye because it is bent on itself within the eye
I don’t see how those 2 stipulations can coexist because they are in conflict (pull straight but splice into an eye where it is not straight in the splice)
I could be wrong, but I believe this has to do with the bend radius. I think 3:1 ratio of host diameter to diameter of eye (or greater) is acceptable with dyneema/amsteel but someone may correct me on that. I think this “rule”, if it is one, suggests that you shouldn’t put too sharp of a bend radius on a properly spliced eye, either. So, again, leaves the consumer (us) to either do their own homework (shocking) or DIY a solution without necessarily acquiescing to the product’s inherent strengths or weaknesses (equally shocking). Tons of gray area to play in there. I’m not a huge personal fan of gray areas in my equipment, and I value purpose-built equipment. but I also appreciate multi-purpose gear…more gray area.
Maybe. I also didn’t say the docs don’t exist. I got that info from somewhere. Probably poking around the sailing forums, this one, arb forums, manufacturers’ specs and such, of course the HN2 channel, and I’m also a chronic caller of manufacturers to ask if I could/would/should use their products for the purposes I’m intending. I realize I am not necessarily in the majority there.Maybe, but simplest explanation is that (especially since the documentation isn't available) it isn't true.
Maybe. I also didn’t say the docs don’t exist. I got that info from somewhere. Probably poking around the sailing forums, this one, arb forums, manufacturers’ specs and such, of course the HN2 channel, and I’m also a chronic caller of manufacturers to ask if I could/would/should use their products for the purposes I’m intending. I realize I am not necessarily in the majority there.
Maybe. I also didn’t say the docs don’t exist. I got that info from somewhere. Probably poking around the sailing forums, this one, arb forums, manufacturers’ specs and such, of course the HN2 channel, and I’m also a chronic caller of manufacturers to ask if I could/would/should use their products for the purposes I’m intending. I realize I am not necessarily in the majority there.
No sweat, she probably would have seen me anyway. Saved by a squirrel. And I am numb to d-baggery for the most part.You quoted my original version where I thought I was being a bit of a d-bag, and then edited it. Sorry about that and your missed doe from another thread!
If you follow the 10:1 safety rule for climbing lines (10% is the safe limit to use), it's a non issue for the most part. Think about it like this, if you were going to fling your rope over a lateral branch (to use as an anchor,) you wouldn't choose a branch that was an inch or two thick. You would want at least 4" in diameter.It could be something related to all ropes.
I'll try to remember/find it, but basically if you anchor a rope at too much of an angle then you greatly increase the mechanical advantage on it and you can snap a very strong rope.
EDIT: Found this which is related but not exactly what I was recalling.
Vector Forces - ropebook
Vector forces become apparent whenever there is an internal angle greater than 0° between two or more rigging components or anchorage points. For ease of…www.ropebook.com
I'm guessing a static rope might be worse.